In the young discipline of Computer Forensics, one of the elements is of greater complexity and importance of driving, is associated with the chain of custody of digital evidence. This is an ongoing process and documented that well executed, allows prove to a court of law, the authenticity of digital physical evidence.
Such evidence must be a tangible and verifiable for monitoring, without reasonable doubt a crime.
And in the cyber world of bits and bytes, where each can be copied accurately, in a manner not possible to recognize the original copy, the issue is extremely difficult to achieve. Thing that sometimes happens with traditional physical evidence, where the DNA of any human being can identify properly the executor of a crime. In a computer, have a fingerprint, or DNA pattern is almost impossible to obtain. The bits can be forge, copy, alter and what will be a bit of information. So
certify the authenticity of digital evidence is often more difficult than with other human evidence. Thus the phase of digital evidence collection begins in fact ensure that they have not been disrupted or contaminated, accidentally or intentionally. Who collects the evidence? It's the first question that has to be rigor. Traditionally, police vested with authority to do so are those who do. The problem arises if the offense or crime may point to the author those bodies that manage the legal test. How to ensure that not manipulate the evidence to relieve his guilt? Was he correct
applying justice if it is judged based on the evidence that provides a single party to the conflict?
The case of supposed computer of Raul Reyes, fall into this same approach. One of the parties in conflict, the Colombian government and the U.S. assistance, is who has the supposed computers.
Why give them credibility? Why rule out that computers were computers that had nothing to do with Reyes, and have been suitably prepared for an indictment and link with others? Remember that the same intelligence and security bodies were Americans who contributed proof and evidence of that in Iraq, Saddam Hussein was preparing weapons of mass destrucciónm threatening the entire globe. Time is charged to prove that it was all a conspiracy of lies to justify an invasion that sought only
seize Iraq's oil.
Other possible questions are: Is the Colombian security forces, more reliable in handling digital evidence? They claimed that in principle was not violated Ecuadorian territory and now are forced to apologize for doing so.
Reyes Can defend or prove that all is not a sophisticated plot to invent evidence? At the time of the Fourth Republic was common "planting" evidence and evidence of crime, whom the government had enemies.
therefore can not give any credibility to what is said comes from the supposed computer of Reyes. The computers can be developed and linked falsamentes. User accounts with names of kings or more, and access codes could be generated to pretend they were among the dead. Full documents could be forged, they could falsicar and then use a scanner to incorporate into the hard drives. Even someone could sit down and create digital signatures on behalf of Reyes or anyone, to then say to the media world, that the document was real authorship of the dead guerrilla. Is a digital document with electronic signatures and encryption that we could obtain and disclose now to show that these
governments or people were in favorable treatment by the FARC-EP. And even if you look at the evidence on screen, everything could be fake, like weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
So, which should not be given any credibility to say what a liar, even though it may be telling the truth. That we learn from children with the children's story Peter and the Wolf. And we are told that to avoid being labeled as a liar to be reliable. Others, like the late former U.S. president United
Richard Nixon, chose to sentence phrases as immoral as this: "Lying is part of the art of diplomacy." So let us never forget. Alberto Salazar
alberto_salazar_2007@yahoo.com
Such evidence must be a tangible and verifiable for monitoring, without reasonable doubt a crime.
And in the cyber world of bits and bytes, where each can be copied accurately, in a manner not possible to recognize the original copy, the issue is extremely difficult to achieve. Thing that sometimes happens with traditional physical evidence, where the DNA of any human being can identify properly the executor of a crime. In a computer, have a fingerprint, or DNA pattern is almost impossible to obtain. The bits can be forge, copy, alter and what will be a bit of information. So
certify the authenticity of digital evidence is often more difficult than with other human evidence. Thus the phase of digital evidence collection begins in fact ensure that they have not been disrupted or contaminated, accidentally or intentionally. Who collects the evidence? It's the first question that has to be rigor. Traditionally, police vested with authority to do so are those who do. The problem arises if the offense or crime may point to the author those bodies that manage the legal test. How to ensure that not manipulate the evidence to relieve his guilt? Was he correct
applying justice if it is judged based on the evidence that provides a single party to the conflict?
The case of supposed computer of Raul Reyes, fall into this same approach. One of the parties in conflict, the Colombian government and the U.S. assistance, is who has the supposed computers.
Why give them credibility? Why rule out that computers were computers that had nothing to do with Reyes, and have been suitably prepared for an indictment and link with others? Remember that the same intelligence and security bodies were Americans who contributed proof and evidence of that in Iraq, Saddam Hussein was preparing weapons of mass destrucciónm threatening the entire globe. Time is charged to prove that it was all a conspiracy of lies to justify an invasion that sought only
seize Iraq's oil.
Other possible questions are: Is the Colombian security forces, more reliable in handling digital evidence? They claimed that in principle was not violated Ecuadorian territory and now are forced to apologize for doing so.
Reyes Can defend or prove that all is not a sophisticated plot to invent evidence? At the time of the Fourth Republic was common "planting" evidence and evidence of crime, whom the government had enemies.
therefore can not give any credibility to what is said comes from the supposed computer of Reyes. The computers can be developed and linked falsamentes. User accounts with names of kings or more, and access codes could be generated to pretend they were among the dead. Full documents could be forged, they could falsicar and then use a scanner to incorporate into the hard drives. Even someone could sit down and create digital signatures on behalf of Reyes or anyone, to then say to the media world, that the document was real authorship of the dead guerrilla. Is a digital document with electronic signatures and encryption that we could obtain and disclose now to show that these
governments or people were in favorable treatment by the FARC-EP. And even if you look at the evidence on screen, everything could be fake, like weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
So, which should not be given any credibility to say what a liar, even though it may be telling the truth. That we learn from children with the children's story Peter and the Wolf. And we are told that to avoid being labeled as a liar to be reliable. Others, like the late former U.S. president United
Richard Nixon, chose to sentence phrases as immoral as this: "Lying is part of the art of diplomacy." So let us never forget. Alberto Salazar
alberto_salazar_2007@yahoo.com
Click on any video to watch
can see others in radiomundial.com.ve
can see others in radiomundial.com.ve
Venezuela alvaro uribe velez , up +6 + of + Venezuela in March Colombian conflict, South American crisis, farc news Venezuela political conflict between Colombia and Venezuela conflict + between + and + Colombia + Ecuador uribe cartoon, political blog today Venezuela politics blog posts women against paramilitary + photos + Colombia peace agreement + humanitarian 13deabril Bolivarian revolution politics hugo chavez Venezuela Motors + Constituency Blogalaxia Policy Chavez Socialism + the + century + xxi Education Psuv Tips + Communal Enabling Power politics hugo chavez Venezuela Noelia constitutional
0 comments:
Post a Comment